The News & Observer
Subscribe | Subscriber Services | Subscriber Rewards Tuesday, February 9, 2010
The Editors' Blog Home / Blogs / The Editors' Blog  

N&O Blogs:  Welcome to N&O blogs | Readers' Corner | Triangle Grammar Guide | Get Out! Get Fit! | WakePol | Notions | The Editors' Blog | On the Beat: David Menconi on music | Uncle Crizzle | Epicurean: The Blog | 2007 N.C. State Fair | ACC Now | WakeEd | TV Eye | Crosstown Traffic | What's The Big Idea? | Lord Stanley's Blog | Bull's Eye | Orange Chat | SWakechat | Backyard Buzz | Between the Lines | Best Blog | Blackwater Current | 

Monday, October 17, 2005

Frame versus filter

This is a book-length topic, but a blog entry in form, so I'll aim for brevity. I enjoyed and learned from last week's discussion around my post on "Real-Life Journalism." Jay Rosen, NYU associate professor who blogs and speaks often about journalism and media, explained his image of a filter as metaphor for the judgement used in putting together daily newspapers. Others added posts and trackbacks.

The problem with the filter metaphor, in my view, is that it seems to say our purpose is to keep things out. I think our purpose is to bring things into view. As I often say, "Find out what's happening, and tell people."

We don't start our work in the newsroom with values defined by partisan politics or ideology. We start with journalism values developed over time and interpreted each day -- values now being translated into The N&O's work online, in blogs and in new forms in our printed paper.

I wrote an N&O column early in the year explaining our newsroom's guiding values, which are framed and posted all over the newsroom, even in the elevator. The opening statement: "The staff of The News & Observer believes in the indispensable role of journalism to inform, engage and empower readers. We are committed to combining the best newspaper traditions with constant innovations...." Here's the column, including the rest of the values statement.

News-gathering is a challenging and imperfect process. The N&O, in a region that's rich in history and popping with change and growth, can never be on top of everything that's happening. But we work pretty hard at gathering news and at telling stories well. Our goals for this year and next focus on working harder for readers by telling stories in clear, direct and engaging ways and by breaking the mold on our approaches. One of the goals concludes this way: "Every day we aim to prove that readers can count on us to get to the bottom of things."

As Rosen says, journalists make choices along the way, what to cover and how to cover things, what to write as a full story or a brief or stand-alone photo or graphic and so forth. Choices are made in a decentralized way, from the level of a photographer framing his image to the restaurant critic deciding which place to review, as well as in some formal processes like front-page meetings.

Again, I see these choices more as gathering and organizing than as filtering -- filtering implies the intention of keeping out certain things that don't support a prescribed outcome. Putting out a daily newspaper (not called "the daily miracle" for nothing) for us involves organizing what seems like an accurate capsule of events and issues for that day. Our focus has long been on regional, local and state news, and with the Internet opening up many other sources for international and national reporting, The N&O's focus is even clearer.

The text that best reflects our newsroom values is "The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect," by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel. Chapters on what journalism is for, the journalism of verification and independence from faction articulate what makes this discipline work.

I've heard the same concepts voiced by some bloggers and others who think The N&O and other news organizations should do better at living up to these values. I agree. That passion for doing journalism well frames our work every day.

Posted at 12:15 pm by Melanie Sill in The Editor's Blog, Journalism's role The Editors' Blog

Comments:

Comment from: AC [Visitor]
10/18/05 at 14:53
Mel -

I'm going to look forward to the discussion of the email and how it interacts with your column.

It's clearly relevant, especially in light of what is filtered in/out or framed in/out.

-AC
Comment from: Melanie Sill [Member] · http://www.newsobserver.com
10/18/05 at 17:12
John,
I think my characterization of the email is accurate. I asked to interview the governor and got a prepared statement by email from his press office. I didn't get a response to my request for an interview. This is the common experience of reporters, not just from our paper. I think my comments stand. I wish I'd thought to post the press office response, because it illustrates my point. As I said, the blog keeps moving, so feel free to email me as you have offline from the blog for a bit more exchange on this if you like, but let's not occupy space here with something off point to this post.
Comment from: John [Visitor] · http://www.johnincarolina.com
10/18/05 at 21:28
Melanie,

You say:

"feel free to email me as you have offline from the blog for a bit more exchange on this if you like"

I know of no email I've sent you "offline" on this matter, other then those letting you know I'd posted on it and encouraging you to responsed either at my blog or yours.

Do you know of any?

If yes, post it or them now.

Otherwise, why did you say "email me as you have offline from the blog" when I hadn't?

What was your purpose?

People want answers to these questions, Melanie, and they want them now.

Provide them!

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

John
Comment from: Jay Rosen [Visitor] · http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/
10/19/05 at 23:37
Melanie: Here's more on the voice of god question. CBS News president Andrew Heyward says it is a problem, and we--meaning CBS News--need to abandon "the illusion on ominscience," adopt more point of view.



see Pressthink, Andrew Heyward: The Era of Omniscience is Over


Leave a comment:


Remember: We reserve the right to delete any comment we deem to be obscene, profane, off topic, harassing or an impersonation. Please be civil.

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options: (Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)

About N&O Blogs


Top editors answer questions and talk about The N&O's print and online news reporting. Contributors are John Drescher, executive editor, and senior editors Dan Barkin, Steve Riley and Linda Williams. Email John with questions or suggestions.


Archives

February 2010
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
<<  <   >  >>
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

June 2008 (6)
May 2008 (23)
April 2008 (15)
March 2008 (19)
February 2008 (19)
January 2008 (19)
December 2007 (21)
November 2007 (16)
October 2007 (19)
September 2007 (20)
August 2007 (20)
July 2007 (25)
Search







Categories


Syndicate this blog

XML What is RSS?

RSS 0.92:  Posts |Comments

RSS 1.0:  Posts |Comments

RSS 2.0:  Posts |Comments

Atom:  Posts |Comments
advertisements
 
View All » Top Jobs
Quick Job Search
Enter Keyword(s):
City:  State:
Select a Category:

View All »Hot Deals
Powered by: Cars.com


© Copyright 2008, The News & Observer Publishing Company
A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company

Help | Contact Us | Parental Consent | Privacy | Terms of Use | RSS Feeds | N&O Store